WHY DON’T MUSLIMS IN INDIA FOLLOW THE ISLAMIC CRIMINAL LAW?
Question 36 : When Muslims in India insist on having a separate Muslim Personal Law for themselves, why don’t they also insist on implementing the Islamic Criminal Law for the Muslims; for example implementing the rule that the robber’s hands should be chopped off if a Muslim robs?
Answer 36 :
1. Muslim Personal Law
Personal Law is a law concerning an individual person and the persons closely related to him, e.g. laws relating to marriage, divorce, inheritance, etc. It includes laws which are mutually agreed upon by a group of people. This law does not include any crime or an act that will harm the society directly.
2. India is Secular And Democratic
In any country, the Personal Law may differ for different groups of people and for different communities. Since India is a secular and democratic country it allows different groups of people to follow their own personal law if they wish.
3. Islamic Personal Law is the Best
Muslims believe that compared to all the different types of personal laws available in the world, the best and the most result oriented is the Islamic Personal Law. Muslims of India prefer following the Muslim personal law also because of their own belief in Islam.
4. Criminal Law
Criminal law is that law which is associated with a crime or an act, which directly affects the society e.g. robbing, raping, murdering, etc.
5. The Criminal Law should be the same for all people
In any country, the criminal law unlike the Personal Law cannot be different for different groups of people. It has to be same for all people of different groups and different religions e.g. In Islam if a person robs, his hands are chopped off. This punishment is not prescribed in Hinduism. If a Hindu robs a Muslim, what would be the robber’s punishment? The Muslim would want the hands of the robber to be chopped, while the Hindu Law would not agree.
6. The Muslims in India alone cannot separately follow the Islamic Criminal Law without involving the Non-Muslims
Even if a Muslim agrees, that as far as he commits a crime he should be given the punishment according to Islamic Criminal Law, it would not be practical. In case an allegation is made against a Muslim for robbery and if the witnesses are Non-Muslims, and if each one follows his own Criminal Law, the punishment in Islam for bearing false witness is 80 lashes, whereas in the Indian Criminal Law, a person giving false witness can easily escape. Thus, for a Non-Muslim to falsely accuse a Muslim of any crime is very easy, if both follow their own criminal law. However, if both follow the Indian Law where the punishment is lenient for false witnesses and robbers, it will encourage both the robber to rob as well as encourage the witnesses to give false witness for their own benefit.
7. The Muslims in India would prefer the Islamic Criminal Law to be implemented on all Indians
We Muslims would prefer that in India the Islamic Criminal Law be implemented on all the Indians, since, chopping the hands of a thief will surely reduce the rate of robbery in India. Similarly, 80 lashes for giving false testimony will prevent a person from giving false witness.
8. Islamic Criminal Law is Most Practical
Islam besides pointing out a crime, it also gives you a solution showing how to prevent the crime e.g. chopping the hands of a robber, death penalty for the rapist. The punishment is so severe that it is a deterrent for the criminal to commit the crime. He will think a hundred times before committing a crime.
Thus if crime has to be reduced or stopped in India the best solution is to implement ‘The Common Islamic Criminal Law’.


what is the aim hand cutting of thieves. some time he may be sad in his activities
and he became a good person . in that time he would not be hands.
in my openion we can punish a theif better than hand cutting.
that is why islamic criminal laws are very brutel.
Eventhoug i am a muslim i have some doubt in it.
Pls clear me it
ok
thank you
Laws are for keeping people from evil, not as a penalty after doing evil. so they should be tough enough.
This answer is total BS. Basically you say I want the best of both worlds. I want my own personal law for my pleasure and for my property but when it comes to crime, I want easy law. If a muslim steals, he prefer going to jail but not get my hand chopped. If a muslim rapes he prefers to go to jail for 7 years instead of death or beaten by stones.
I mean no offence but if you want to follow muslim law do it. BUT it has to be EVERY ASPECT of islam. Not safe, best and easy part. I want to follow islam when it comes to marrying or divorce or property but when it comes to crime, I do want to follow democratic law.
When it comes to cricket, I support muslim country but I live in India ( I am sure atleast 40% muslim men does that).
This is what upsets most Indians. Else there would be no issues between hindus or muslims.
Right way for india is implement Muslim criminal law for every one hindu and muslim. Let muslims follow their personal law and rest follow democratic personal law